<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No More Washington Post Book World?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeflood.com/2009/01/28/no-more-washington-post-book-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeflood.com/2009/01/28/no-more-washington-post-book-world/</link>
	<description>writer, photographer, web person</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: melissa dickinson</title>
		<link>http://joeflood.com/2009/01/28/no-more-washington-post-book-world/comment-page-1/#comment-4899</link>
		<dc:creator>melissa dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 13:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeflood.com/?p=177#comment-4899</guid>
		<description>I agree entirely.  I emailed WP to complain about the change, but never heard back. I mean, for heaven&#039;s sake, if we get the paper, obviously we like reading, and if you like to read, you want to actually READ about books!  I don&#039;t want to fish through their website for reviews, and the ones they have hidden in the Outlook section are always nonfiction, and always on the same theme.  Really, I only got the paper for BW and the coupons, which have also been absent the past two weeks, so I&#039;m giving the paper one more week before I cancel my subscription.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree entirely.  I emailed WP to complain about the change, but never heard back. I mean, for heaven&#8217;s sake, if we get the paper, obviously we like reading, and if you like to read, you want to actually READ about books!  I don&#8217;t want to fish through their website for reviews, and the ones they have hidden in the Outlook section are always nonfiction, and always on the same theme.  Really, I only got the paper for BW and the coupons, which have also been absent the past two weeks, so I&#8217;m giving the paper one more week before I cancel my subscription.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Grodsky</title>
		<link>http://joeflood.com/2009/01/28/no-more-washington-post-book-world/comment-page-1/#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Grodsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeflood.com/?p=177#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>I am devastated. Book World was my favorite section, the dessert hidden deep in the core of the print paper.

What&#039;s an English major, now monetizing her talent as a content writer, to do?

And what will Book World&#039;s talented staff do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am devastated. Book World was my favorite section, the dessert hidden deep in the core of the print paper.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s an English major, now monetizing her talent as a content writer, to do?</p>
<p>And what will Book World&#8217;s talented staff do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does The End of Washington Post Book World Mean the End of Books Coverage? : Edward Champion&#8217;s Reluctant Habits</title>
		<link>http://joeflood.com/2009/01/28/no-more-washington-post-book-world/comment-page-1/#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>Does The End of Washington Post Book World Mean the End of Books Coverage? : Edward Champion&#8217;s Reluctant Habits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeflood.com/?p=177#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>[...] do we miss paper coverage.&#8221; And to address the print sentiments of Elizabeth Foxwell and Joe Flood, it&#8217;s worth observing again that there will still be a print section that you can curl up to. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do we miss paper coverage.&#8221; And to address the print sentiments of Elizabeth Foxwell and Joe Flood, it&#8217;s worth observing again that there will still be a print section that you can curl up to. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

